Three minutes, recorded
Watch it interview somebody.
Not a feature tour. One real screen from the inside: the AI holds a conversation with an applicant, follows the thread wherever they take it, and turns what they said into evidence a hiring manager can open.
$0.10/application · $7.00/completed interview. No card needed.
What you are watching
A conversation, turning into something you can check.
The interesting part of the recording is not that the AI can talk. It is what survives the conversation afterwards — and who is holding it when the talking stops.
Fifteen minutes, on their own schedule, in whatever room they are in.
- 01the machine
It is not reading from a script
Watch what happens after the second answer. It picks up the thing the candidate said in passing, asks about it, and keeps pulling until there is something specific enough to be worth writing down. A form could not have asked that question.
- Adaptive follow-ups
- Same rubric for everyone
- 02the machine
Every score keeps its receipt
No number appears without the moment it came from. Open the score, land on the sentence, play the recording from there and hear it — which is the only version of “strong on data modelling” worth showing someone who was not in the room.
Why this scoreData modelling4/ 5“I'd denormalise the junction object first — the report needed one row per quote line, not per opportunity.”
Transcript 07:42 · the recording opens at this moment
- 03you
And then it stops and waits
The last thing in the recording is the thing the AI would not settle. It is marked, held, and handed over — because a shortlist that decided itself is not a shortlist, it is a rejection pile with better manners.
3 of 4 metPriya N.
Senior ServiceNow Developer · Platform Engineering
must-have
3+ years hands-on ServiceNow ITSM
“Led the ITSM rollout at Kestrel for four years — incident, problem and change.”
Resume, page 1 · their words, not our summary must-have
Regulated-industry exposure
Nothing in the resume settles this one either way.
Needs reviewyou decide this one
Interview 14:12 · camera onData modelling 4/5 ↳ 07:42 in the transcript
The half most demos skip
What the candidate walks away with.
They gave you fifteen minutes. Whether or not it ends in an offer, the interview is worth something to them too — which is the difference between a screen people complete and a screen people abandon halfway through.
Feedback, answer by answer. On what they actually said, not a rejection template.
The transcript is theirs. Theirs to read, keep and download.
Skill proofs they carry. Backed by the interview they just did, not locked inside your system.
They can practise first. Free AI mock interviews, ten a month, private by default.
Recording consent is asked for before the interview starts, and kept with the application. Nobody is recorded by surprise.
Your applicants, not ours
The recording is someone else's role. Run yours.
A demo can only ever show you our example. Two weeks on one of your own openings shows you whether the transcripts tell you anything the resumes did not — which is the only question that matters.
A live walkthrough uses one of your real openings, and takes thirty minutes.